Adkins v. Rumsfeld’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Neitzke v. Williams · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia · Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Court is not confined to the allegations of the complaint” and “may consider evidence outside the pleadings, including affidavits, depositions and testimony, to resolve any factual issues bearing on jurisdiction.”). 14 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.