Commonwealth v. Bostock’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
44 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Commonwealth v. Silva · Commonwealth v. Borges · Commonwealth v. Jimenez · Commonwealth v. Isaiah I.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]ur duty is to make an independent determination of the correctness of the judge's application of constitutional * principles to the facts as found.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“strip or visual body cavity searches, by their very nature, are humiliating, demeaning, and terrifying experiences that, without question, constitute a substantial intrusion on one's personal privacy rights protected under the Fourth Amendment [to the United States Constitution] and art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Where a police officer has a reasonable, articulable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime, the officer may stop that person to conduct a threshold inquiry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.