Draper v. Burke’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738B · 42 U.S.C. § 666 (§ 466 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Hines v. Davidowitz · California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guerra · Child Support Enforcement Division of Alaska v. Brenckle · 25 Kan. App. 2d 552 - Gentzel v. Williams · LeTellier v. LeTellier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f there is no individual contestant or child residing in the issuing [s]tate, the party or support enforcement agency seeking to modify, or to modify and enforce, a child support order issued in another [s]tate shall register that order in a [s]tate with jurisdiction over the nonmovant for the purpose of modification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.