State v. Hines’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · Richardson v. Marsh · Maryland v. Craig · Gray v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Rule permits the judge to do so by severing the offenses or the co-defendants, or by granting other relief, such as, for example, giving a limiting instruction or redacting evidence to remove any reference to the defendant against whom it is inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]here evidence of one crime would be admissible at a separate trial on another charge, a defendant will not suffer any additional prejudice if the two charges are tried together.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the defendant must show that non-mutually admissible evidence will be introduced and that the admission of such evidence will result in unfair prejudice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.