Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 450 P.2d 157 - Spight v. State

Spight v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ewell · Pollard v. United States · Beavers v. Haubert · Medina v. People · Frankel v. Woodrough

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““What is a ‘speedy public trial’? Most important, it involves a ‘trial’ — a judicial examination of issues present in a criminal case in order to arrive at a just result. Justice to both the accused and the public is the primary objective. Frankel v. Woodrough, 8 Cir., 7 F.2d 796 . See People v. Henwood, 65 Colo. 566 , 179 P. 874 . ‘Speed’ is important insofar as it aids in the achievement of such justice. Hence, a speedy trial is a relative concept in that the circumstances of each case determine whether it has been afforded an accused.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “relative concept in that the circumstances of each case determine whether it had been afforded an accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.