Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 450 P.2d 161 - Ingram v. State

Ingram v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 1984
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kercheval v. United States · LundBerg v. Bannan · United States v. Cariola · United States v. Lester · Domenica v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A defendant may plead not guilty, guilty or, with the consent of the court, nolo contendere. The court may refuse to accept a plea of guilty, and shall not accept such plea without first determining that the plea is made voluntarily with understanding of the nature of the charge. . . . The court shall not enter a judgment upon a plea of guilty unless it is satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.