State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Virginia v. Black · State v. Ward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A constitutional error is harmless if the State can show 'beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of will not or did not affect the outcome of the trial in light of the entire record, i.e., where 5 there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the verdict.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he district court instructed the jury on both forms of criminal threat and accurately recited the [statutory] definitions of 'intentionally' and 'recklessly'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lindemuth“[n]o jury would find 15 these threats were anything other than intentionally made with the intent to place another in fear.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.