Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 450 SO2D 1067 - State v. Miles

State v. Miles’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 389 So. 2d 1263 - State v. Douglas · 383 So. 2d 1 - State v. Harris · 387 So. 2d 592 - State v. Skipper · 333 So. 2d 919 - State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The contemporaneous objection rule exists, not only so that a trial judge may correct the error at the time it is made, but it also serves notice in the record that the complained of conduct was so noticeable as to create prejudice in the minds of those observing it, i.e., the trier of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.