Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

450 So. 2d 351

Cikora v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-05-30

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1988

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-05-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction because no reversible error was made to appear. As to the order revoking probation, four violations were claimed. We record that the first alleged violation, attempted burglary of the home of Florence Jarboe, was unsupported by record evidence and, thus, was not proven. However, the three remaining alleged violations were proven and furnish adequate support for the revocation.

¶2Affirmed.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
/450/so2d/351 · .json · Public domain