¶2I concur because the trial court must have implicitly determined that the omission was the result of an "error or accident" and, therefore, that correction or modification of the record was appropriate pursuant to A.R.App.P. 10 (f). *467
450 So. 2d 464
Ex Parte Edwards
Decided May 11, 1984
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-05-11
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2008
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →