Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 450 So. 2d 855 - State v. Robarge

450 So. 2d 855 - State v. Robarge’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2017

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

601984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Bakeries Co. v. City of Haines City · 406 So. 2d 1089 - Parker v. State · State v. Rodriquez · Baeumel v. State · 232 So. 2d 166 - State v. Kahler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the terms of the concealed weapon/firearm statute, the state does not have the burden of proving the absence of a license as an element of the crime. Rather, proof of a license is pertinent only as an affirmative defense. Generally, for a statutory exception, such as a license, to constitute a defense under Florida law, the exception “must be in a clause subsequent to the enacting clause of a statute.”. ... The license defense is in the subsequent clause.... As such, it is an affirmative defense, not an element of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whoever shall carry around with him, or have in his manual possession, ... any pistol, electric weapon or device, or Winchester rifle or other repeating rifle without having a license ... shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.... (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.