450 So. 2d 888 - Goodmakers v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2011
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 255 So. 2d 675 - Chesebrough v. State · Chandler v. O'Bryan · State v. Upton · 332 So. 2d 333 - State v. Dwyer · Boles v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n order for there to be a violation of [the indecent exposure statute], there must be, coupled with mere nudity, `lascivious' exposition or exhibition of the defendant's sexual organs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the perpetrator's exposition or exhibition involves `an unlawful indulgence in lust, eager for sexual indulgence.' Cheesebrough v. State, 255 So.2d 675, 677 (Fla. 1971).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual design on the part of the perpetrator.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.