Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 450 SW2D 168 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably State v. Milligan (1976), State v. Taylor (1974)

25 state decisions

20019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Barber v. Page · Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc. · Osborn v. United States · Taylor v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Entrapment as a matter of law is not established where there is any substantial evidence from which it may be inferred that the intention to commit the crime originated in the mind of the accused, 22 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 45(2), p. 141, or, as stated in United States v. Haden, 7 Cir., 397 F.2d, 460, 466 , ‘ * * * unless it is patently clear from the undisputed evidence that government agents originated the criminal design and implanted in the mind of an innocent person the disposition to commit the crime.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “That no law shall delegate to any commission, bureau, board or other administrative agency authority to make any rule fixing a fine or imprisonment as punishment for its violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.