Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 450 SW3D 696 - Johnson v. Commonwealth

Johnson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · Purkett v. Elem

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant made the requisite initial prima facie showing of racial discrimination necessary for a Batson challenge: (1) Appellant is African-American; (2) Juror Fourteen is African-American; (3) the prosecutor, struck Juror Fourteen from the jury pool. Nothing more is required to permit an inference of racial discrimination.”). See also Taylor v. Commonwealth, 2015 WL 5626433 (Ky.2015), '.' KRS 532.050(1)'. . KRS 532.050(6). . Ky. Const. § 28 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Whatever is causing the ‘gut feeling’ should be explained for proper evaluation of the proffered reason.”) (quoting Alex v. Rayne Concrete Serv., 951 So.2d 138, 153 (La.2007)). . Id. at 705-06. . See, e.g., Commonwealth v. English, 993 S.W.2d 941, 945 (Ky.1999) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.