Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 450 U.S. 107 - Democratic Party of United States v. Wisconsin Ex Rel. La Follette

Democratic Party of United States v. Wisconsin Ex Rel. La Follette’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

529
cited by 529 later decisions
33
cited 33 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

170 federal appellate · 66 district · 77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 529 later decisions (33 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2025 · most notably Roberts v. United States Jaycees (1984), Anderson v. Celebrezze (1983)

170 federal appellate · 66 district · 77 state decisions — followed in 17 states

173019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257

Relies on National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson · Branti v. Finkel · Dunn v. Blumstein · United States v. Classic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 529 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “necessarily presupposes the freedom to identify the people who constitute the association, and to limit the association to those people only.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] court[ ] may not constitutionally substitute its own judgment for that of the Party. A political party's choice among the various ways of determining the makeup of a State's delegation to the party's national convention is protected by the Constitution.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[a]ny interference with the freedom of a party is simultaneously an interference with the freedom of its adherents.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.