Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 450 U.S. 221 - Schweiker v. Wilson

Schweiker v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

1,516
cited by 1,516 later decisions
51
cited 51 times by the Supreme Court
38
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

439 federal appellate · 160 district · 305 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,516 later decisions (51 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center (1985), Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. (1982)

439 federal appellate · 160 district · 305 state decisions — followed in 38 states

663019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Dandridge v. Williams · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher

Cited together with City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Dandridge v. Williams · United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz · Vance v. Bradley · City of New Orleans v. Dukes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,516 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “advances legitimate legislative goals in a rational fashion.”
    48 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that legislation classify the persons it affects in a manner rationally related to legitimate governmental objectives.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a statutory distinction does not violate the Equal Protection Clause 'if any state of facts reasonably may be conceived to justify it,'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.