Willard Junior Chunn v. J. J. Clark, Warden’s Empirical Analysis
451 F.2d 1005 · 1971
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Piper v. Estelle (1973), United States v. Allen (1979)
36 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 500 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Davis v. Attorney General of United States · Cecil T. Hart v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden · Derengowski v. U. S. Marshal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a prisoner has no standing to contest an agreement between two sovereigns concerning the temporary exchange of custody of the prisoner on a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, or their agreement as to the order of his prosecution and execution of sentences”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.