Between Globe Seaways, Inc. v. Globe Seaways, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
451 F.2d 1159 · 1971
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably Rochdale Village, Inc. v. Public Service Employees Union, Local No. 80 (1979), Crilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (1976)
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Drake Bakeries Incorporated v. Local 50 American Bakery Confectionery Workers International · Stoner v. California · Tocco v. United States · Hanna Mining Co. v. District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n · Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he fact that the employer chose thereafter not to change many of the working conditions which had prevailed under the expired agreement does not tend in any way to establish that that agreement was, or was considered to be, or was treated as still effective. Globe Seaways, supra, at 1163 , quoting, Procter & Gamble, supra, at 184.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.