Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 451 F.2d 1277 - Amanda Bent Bolt Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 1549

Amanda Bent Bolt Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 1549’s Empirical Analysis

451 F.2d 1277 · 1971

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
5
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Mistletoe Express Service, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Motor Expressmen's Union, a Labor Organization, and Roy Martin (1977), Detroit Coil Co. v. International Ass'n of Machinists Workers, Lodge # 82 (1979)

21 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

23019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · United Steelworkers of America, a.f.l-c.i.o., and United Steelworkers of America, a.f.l.-c.i.o., Local No. 6378 v. Caster Mold and MacHine Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n arbitrator is confined to interpretation and application of the collective bargaining agreement; he does not sit to dispense his own brand of industrial justice. He may of course look for guidance from many sources, yet his award is legitimate only so long as it draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement. When the arbitrator’s words manifest an infidelity to this obligation, courts have no choice but to refuse enforcement of the award.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`no power to add to, subtract from or modify any of the terms of this agreement.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the determination of the penalty was reserved to the company and was not the prerogative of the arbitrator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.