Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

451 F.2d 347

Docket No. 71-1343.

United States v. Hall

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 1, 1971.

Decided Nov. 30, 1971.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-11-30

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1979

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 751

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1971-11-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*348John F. Brown, Jr., Elkins, W. Va. (Court-appointed), on brief for appellant.

¶2Paul C. Camilletti, U. S. Atty., and Stephen G. Jory, Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief, for appellee.

¶3Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Ralph Hall is appealing his conviction for escape from the custody of the Attorney General.1 At the time of the admitted escape, Hall had been brought to the Ohio County Jail2 in West Virginia from the federal penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia pursuant to a federal Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum. He contends that his escape was from state authorities rather than from the custody of the Attorney General and that the indictment charging him was defective.

¶6The crime for which Hall was convicted includes escape “from any custody under or by virtue of any process issued under the laws of the United States by any court [or] judge … 3 Since Hall was in custody under a federal Writ of Habeas Corpus, he has violated this express provision of the statute.

¶7The indictment against Hall sufficiently apprised him of the acts he was accused of committing and of the statute he was accused of violating.

¶8Affirmed.

/451/f2d/347 · .json · Public domain