Cates v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
451 F.2d 411 · 1971
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co. (1988), McFarland v. Leyh (1995)
45 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106 · 28 U.S.C. § 2111
Relies on Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · McAllister v. United States · Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique · In Re Disbarment of Isserman · Garrett v. Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the damages assessed against him have in fact and in actuality been previously covered in a prior settlement....”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“is upon one who sets up a seaman’s release to show that it was executed freely, without deception or coercion, and that it was made by the seaman with full understanding of his rights. The adequacy of the consideration and the nature of the medical and legal advice available to the seaman at the time of signing the release are relevant to an appraisal of this understanding. (emphasis omitted)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[a] court of admiralty is, as to all matters falling within its jurisdiction, a court of equity. Its hands are not tied up by the rigid and technical rules of the common law, but it administers justice upon the large and liberal principles of courts which exercise a general equity jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.