United States v. White’s Empirical Analysis
451 F.2d 559 · 1971
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2004
18 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314
Relies on United States v. Wolfenbarger · United States v. Tannuzzo · Kasle v. United States · Rosen v. United States · Banning v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ ‘The status of the articles, in the sense of being interstate or intrastate in character, cannot in the nature of things áffect the fact either of the stealing or receiving alleged; and the statute, whether federal or state, is at bottom aimed against stealing or receiving.’ ”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.