United States v. Smith

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 20, 1971.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-12-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1971

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Andersen · United States v. Zaragoza

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1971-12-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Barry J. Portman (argued), Deputy Federal Public Defender, John K. Van De Kamp, Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

¶2Chester L. Brown, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U. S. Atty. & Chief, Criminal Division, Tom G. Kon-tos, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶3Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, CROCKER, District Judge*.

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6The judgment of conviction must be reversed. United States v. Andersen, 9 Cir., 1971, 447 F.2d 1063; United States v. Zaragoza, 9 Cir., 1971, 449 F.2d 1278.

¶7Reversed. The mandate will issue forthwith, and the indictment shall be dismissed. A petition for rehearing will not be entertained.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Judges

BD
Benjamin Cushing Duniway
Circuit Judge
WJ
Walter Raleigh Ely Jr.
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

Barry J. Portman (argued), Deputy Federal Public Defender, John K. Van De Kamp, Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Chester L. Brown, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U. S. Atty. & Chief, Criminal Division, Tom G. Kon-tos, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.