Newman v. Avco Corporation-Aerospace Structures Division’s Empirical Analysis
451 F.2d 743 · 1971
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. (1974), Macklin v. Spector Freight Systems Inc. (1973)
19 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Vaca v. Sipes · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'only where conflicting and inconsistent remedies are sought on the basis of conflicting and inconsistent rights.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only where conflicting and inconsistent remedies are sought ori the basis of conflicting and inconsistént rights. Thus, where a suit is brought on a contract as written, a later, second, suit cannot be brought to reform! that same contract. On the other hand, one may pursue a second remedy after seeking, unsuccessfully, a first remedy, if the claims are based upon consistent facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barachkov v. Lucido“In short, major aspects of this District Court complaint were either not submitted to arbitration or were beyond the arbitrator’s power of decision. To such issues plainly neither the doctrine of res judicata nor collateral estoppel can apply. Id., at 748 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.