Lapiczak v. Zaist’s Empirical Analysis
451 F.2d 79 · 1971
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2000 · most notably Meriwether v. Coughlin (1989), Stradley v. Cortez (1975)
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on United States v. Robinson · Freid v. McGrath · Johnson Tsai v. Anne C. Rosenthal and Mound Motors, Inc., Anne C. Rosenthal v. Johnson Tsai and Mound Motors, Inc. · Demeretz v. Daniels Motor Freight, Inc. · National Farmers Union Auto. & Cas. Co. v. Wood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]ot later than 10 days after entry of judgment.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“mandatory and jurisdictional and ... cannot be circumvented regardless of excuse.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ . . . may not extend the time for taking any action under Rules 50 (b), 52(b), 59(b), (d), and (e), and 60(b), except to the extent and under the conditions stated in them.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.