United States v. deShazer’s Empirical Analysis
451 F.3d 1221 · 2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
June 2011
most recently cited
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Indiana · United States v. MacDonald · United States v. Tranakos · United States v. Deters · United States of America v. Peter a Filippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[TJhis court’s precedents indicate an interlocutory appeal in the context of pretrial commitment for competency proceedings is permitted because the “disputed question,” i.e., the defendant’s liberty interest in not being confined during an evaluation, is wholly separate from the merits of the criminal case. That interest cannot be fully vindicated in an appeal from a final judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.