Neumont v. Florida’s Empirical Analysis
451 F.3d 1284 · 2006
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Washburn v. Rabun · 183 So. 2d 193 - Ellison v. City of Fort Lauderdale · 786 F. Supp. 1089 - Satellite Broadcasting Cable, Inc. v. Telefonica De España · 736 F. Supp. 1094 - Southern Entertainment Co. v. City of Boynton Beach · Save Our Dunes v. Alabama Department of Environmental Management
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. Therefore, the circuit court certified to us the following question: Whether, for purposes of Florida Statutes section 125.66(4)(b), a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is determinative of the cause and for which there is no controlling precedent of the supreme court of Florida.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Raborn v. Menotte“actual list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses within a zoning category,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Neumont v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.