Yousuf v. Samantar’s Empirical Analysis
451 F.3d 248 · 2006
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Lippoldt v. Cole (2006), Watts v. Securities & Exchange Commission (2007)
14 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 1 U.S.C. § 1 (Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002) · 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 28 U.S.C. § 1782 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 704
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Russello v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an agency's refusal to comply with a subpoena constitutes `final agency action . . . ripe for . . . review under the APA.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]ith respect to the Federal Rules in particular, the Supreme Court has instructed that, except where doing so would 'produce absurd results,' 'words and phrases ... must be given a consistent usage and be read in pari materia [;] ... to do otherwise would attribute a schizophrenic intent to the drafters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“); see also 9 JAMES WM. MOORE ET AL., MOORE'S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 45.05[1][b] (3d ed. 2006) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.