Worth v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
451 F.3d 854 · 2006
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 38 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Equal Rights Center v. Post Properties, Inc. (2011), Fund for Animals, Inc. v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management (2006)
11 federal appellate · 38 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Allen v. Wright · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the plaintiff must have suffered an injury in fact-an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical. Second, there must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of-the injury has to be fairly ... trace[able] to the challenged action of the defendant, and not ... th[e] result [of] the independent action of some third party not before the court. Third, it must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“we cannot assess a facial challenge to an unwritten policy that by definition has no face.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Reid v. Hurwitz · Reid v. Hurwitz“it is well settled that a defendant's voluntary cessation of a challenged practice does not deprive a federal court of its power to determine the legality of the practice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.