Clawson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
12 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on Pullman Co. v. Jenkins · Curry v. City of Syracuse · United States v. Williams · Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc. · Freeman v. Stanbern Construction Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ujnder ... the plain language of 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (b), this action could have been removed ... at any time after it was filed ... so long as [the forum-defendant] was ... unserved”); Poznanovich v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, No. 114001 (JAP), 2011 WL 6180026 , at (D.N.J. Dec. 12, 2011) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.