Lamone v. Schlakman’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1654 · 28 U.S.C. § 2071 (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amendments) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973F (§ 8 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)
Relies on Storer v. Brown · Jenness v. Fortson · Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of Cosmetologists · Mayor of Baltimore v. Chase · Schisler v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even granting, arguendo , that [the plaintiffs] did not learn of the [Baltimore] City Board[ of Elections]'s certification of [ ] Sparaco's candidacy until August 15, 2016, [the date on which Sparaco voluntarily dismissed his complaint in the federal court,] their challenge under [EL] § 12-202(a) came too late because they did not file the instant action in the [c]ircuit [c]ourt ... until September 20, 2016, when their complaint was docketed by the clerk[,] and, on this record, their delay was unreasonable and prejudicial to [the defendant]s and the election process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[ EL §] 12-202... governs judicial challenges to certain irregularities in relation to an election; it provides judicial redress for any act or omission that violates the Election Law Article.... [EL] § 12-202(b) [,] by its terms, affords a party the opportunity to challenge irregularities as elaborated in [EL] § 12-202(a) by seeking judicial relief in the appropriate circuit court, and constitutes general judicial review authority when no other Election Law provisions apply.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]e review de novo " the circuit court's decision. Cabrera v. Penate , 439 Md. 99 , 106, 94 A.3d 50 , 54 (2014) (citation omitted). And, "[w]here the issue is whether a party is precluded by [the doctrine of] laches from challenging an action of another party, we shall review the trial court's ultimate determination of the issue de novo .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.