Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 451 NW2D 710 - State v. Jenner

State v. Jenner’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Jenner v. Smith (1993), State v. Moeller (1996)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions

3101990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Colorado v. Connelly · Mincey v. Arizona · Oregon v. Mathiason · Michigan v. Mosley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing the trial court's findings on voluntariness, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the finding.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any interview of one suspected of a crime by a police officer will have coercive as pects to it, simply by virtue of the fact that the police officer is part of a law enforcement system which may ultimately cause the suspect to be charged with a crime. But police officers are not required to administer Miranda warnings to everyone whom they question. Nor is the requirement of warning to be imposed simply because the questioning takes place in the station house, or because the questioned person is one whom the police suspect. Miranda warnings are required only where there has been such a restriction on a person’s freedom as to render him ‘in custody.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “whether there is evidence in the record, which, if believed by the jury, is sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.... In making this determination, the Court will accept that evidence, and the most favorable inferences fairly drawn therefrom, which will support the verdict.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.