State v. Jenner’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Jenner v. Smith (1993), State v. Moeller (1996)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Colorado v. Connelly · Mincey v. Arizona · Oregon v. Mathiason · Michigan v. Mosley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing the trial court's findings on voluntariness, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the finding.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Helmer · State v. Erickson“Any interview of one suspected of a crime by a police officer will have coercive as pects to it, simply by virtue of the fact that the police officer is part of a law enforcement system which may ultimately cause the suspect to be charged with a crime. But police officers are not required to administer Miranda warnings to everyone whom they question. Nor is the requirement of warning to be imposed simply because the questioning takes place in the station house, or because the questioned person is one whom the police suspect. Miranda warnings are required only where there has been such a restriction on a person’s freedom as to render him ‘in custody.’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Darby · State v. Thompson“whether there is evidence in the record, which, if believed by the jury, is sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.... In making this determination, the Court will accept that evidence, and the most favorable inferences fairly drawn therefrom, which will support the verdict.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sondreal · State v. Peck
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.