Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 451 P3D 467 - State v. Owens

State v. Owens’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars · State v. Smallwood · State v. Otero

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “generally cannot be raised for the first time in a petition for review”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'A deliberate attempt to delay the trial in order to hamper the defense should be weighted heavily against the government. A more neutral reason such as negligence or overcrowded courts should be weighted less heavily but nevertheless should be considered since the ultimate responsibility for such circumstances must rest with the government rather than with the defendant. Finally, a valid reason, such as a missing witness, should serve to justify appropriate delay.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Because the test requires a balancing, none of these factors is a necessary or sufficient condition for 11 finding a violation. Instead, we consider them together along with any other relevant circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.