Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 451 PA 211 - Commonwealth v. Mercier

Commonwealth v. Mercier’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably Solem v. Stumes (1984), Commonwealth v. Yount (1974)

65 state decisions

37019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Commonwealth v. Simala · Commonwealth v. Bordner · Commonwealth v. Hamilton · Commonwealth v. Nathan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a waiver to be effective, the reversal of the defendant's position must have been initiated by him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`any question likely to or expected to elicit a confession constitutes `interrogation' under Miranda'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““[RJeading the statement after appellant had exercised his Miranda rights was totally impermissible. Interrogation should have ceased once the appellant exercised his constitutional rights, and, since we hold the reading of the statement of a third party to appellant was a form of interrogation, obviously interrogation did not cease. Hence, the police violated the mandate of Miranda.” Id. at 215, 302 A.2d at 340 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.