Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

451 So. 2d 1278

State v. Alexandra

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1984

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1984-06-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1988

3 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“the State has no affirmative duty to find and produce rap sheets.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including 524 So. 2d 160 - State v. Seifert, 454 So. 2d 871 - State v. Whitlock

Relies on State v. Harvey · State v. Washington · 422 So. 2d 1297 - State v. Hines

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-06-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1WRIT MADE

¶2PEREMPTORY — REMANDED

¶3In a discovery motion the defendant requested “any record in the possession of the state or accessible to the state (or any information) that sets forth the arrest and conviction record of any witnesses that the state intends to call in this matter.”

¶4The State seeks review of the trial judge’s broad order that “the defense be provided a ‘rap sheet’ on anybody that testifies in this case.”

¶5The State is obligated, if requested, only to “respond to a specific request of the defense by stating whether the state had knowledge or possession of the conviction records” and to furnish them to the defendant or submit them to the court to determine entitlement. State v. Washington, 407 So.2d 1138 (La.1981) citing State v. Harvey, 358 So.2d 1224 (La.1978).

¶6The State has no affirmative duty to find and produce rap sheets. See State v. Hines, 422 So.2d 1297 (La.App. 4th Cir.1982).

¶7Therefore, this matter is remanded for the State to respond to question # 1 of the Motion as to its possession of criminal records on its witnesses.

/451/so2d/1278 · .json · Public domain