Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 451 So. 2d 208 - Young v. State

451 So. 2d 208 - Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Heidel v. State (1991), Blue v. State (1996)

26 state decisions

1101984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · 208 So. 2d 886 - Carr v. State · 308 So. 2d 71 - Newell v. State · Newton v. State · McBroom v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “lies within the sound judicial discretion of the trial judge who may limit or expand `for good cause shown'.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he defendant is entitled to have an instruction on his theory of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “At least twenty-four hours prior to trial each of the attorneys must number and file the attorney's jury instructions with the clerk, serving all other attorneys with copies of the instructions. Except for good cause shown, the court will not entertain a request for additional instruction or instructions, which have not been prefiled. At the conclusion of testimony, the attorneys must select no more than six jury instructions on the substantive law of the case from the instructions prefiled and present them to the judge. The court, for good cause shown, may allow more than six instructions on the substantive law to be presented. The attorneys must dictate into the record their specific objections to the requested instructions stating the grounds for each objection. Instructions will not be given after closing argument has begun except in extreme cases of injustice and in such cases the adverse parties shall have an opportunity to submit other instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.