451 So. 2d 270 - Hallmark v. Allison’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2018
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Leith v. State · Blakeney v. Alabama Power Co. · 379 So. 2d 590 - Hill v. Cherry · Dulaney v. Burns · McCormick v. Badham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“crucial in resolving a key material issue in the case.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'important in reaching [their] decision because it would be physically impossible for the boy to hit the windshield while standing straight up.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[j]uror misconduct will justify a new trial when . . . the misconduct affected the verdict, or when from the extraneous facts prejudice may be presumed as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.