Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 451 So. 2d 394 - Darrow v. State

451 So. 2d 394 - Darrow v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 1999
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shadle v. State · 333 So. 2d 193 - Retowsky v. State · 414 So. 2d 1014 - Jackson v. State · 378 So. 2d 1186 - Walls v. State · 409 So. 2d 455 - Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(b) In any prosecution for criminal sexual conduct or for assault with intent to commit, attempt to commit or conspiracy to commit criminal sexual conduct, evidence relating to the past sexual behavior of the complaining witness, as defined in subsection (a) of this section, shall not be admissible, either as direct evidence or on cross-examination of the complaining witness or of other witnesses, except as otherwise provided in this section. "(c) In any prosecution for criminal sexual conduct, evidence relating to the past sexual behavior of the complaining witness shall be introduced if the court, following the procedure described in subsection (d) of this section, finds that such past sexual behavior directly involved the participation of the accused."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[e]vidence of sexual activity between the complaining witness and third persons . . . immaterial and irrelevant.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.