Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 451 So. 2d 425 - Yearby v. State

451 So. 2d 425 - Yearby v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2015

6 state decisions

201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an appeal may be taken within 42 days (six weeks) after the denial or overruling of the motion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 602 So. 2d 504 - Martinez v. State · 545 So. 2d 246 - Conley v. State
  2. “if the notice of appeal was not timely filed to invoke the jurisdiction of the appellate court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 530 So. 2d 903 - State v. Reiner · 545 So. 2d 246 - Conley v. State
  3. “A `motion to reduce sentence' is not a `motion in arrest of judgment, motion for new trial, or motion for judgment of acquittal' and does not expand the time limit for filing a notice of appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 530 So. 2d 903 - State v. Reiner

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.