Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

451 So. 2d 471

Florida Bar v. Mike

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 24, 1984

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1984-05-24

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-05-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2012 · most notably Ford v. Wainwright (1986), 490 So. 2d 927 - Maxwell v. Wainwright (1986)

15 state decisions

1901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Mike’s alleged misconduct. Mike tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, acknowledging his violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(6), 3-101(B) and article XI, Rule 11.02(3)(a) of The Florida Bar’s Integration Rule. The referee recommended that Mike be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand and be placed on probation for two years.

¶2Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand, and Robert Mike, II, is placed on probation for two years, effective thirty days from the filing of this opinion, and during his probation his practice shall be supervised with quarterly status reports on his cases being submitted to The Florida Bar.

¶3Costs in the amount of $761.59 are hereby taxed against Mike.

¶4It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and BOYD, OV-ERTON, McDonald and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.
/451/so2d/471 · .json · Public domain