Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 451 So. 2d 724 - Wilson v. State

451 So. 2d 724 - Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2018

15 state decisions

501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brooks v. State · Ruffin v. State · 258 So. 2d 756 - Norwood v. State · 185 So. 2d 667 - Roberson v. State · Diddlemeyer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]nce a confession is admitted into evidence, a defendant is entitled to submit evidence and have the jury pass upon the factual issues of its truth and voluntariness and upon its weight and credibility.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “BY MR. ALEXANDER: We object to testimony on the grounds that it is objected to [sic] the Court in a pretrial Motion to Suppress the Statement. To reiterate, we object to any statement given to the Sheriff, that it was not voluntary. That it was taken in violation of the 4th, 5th, and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution and should be excluded and no reference to any such statement should be made at this trial. BY THE COURT: After hearing the Motion to exclude and all evidence pertaining thereto, the Court has ruled that the statement was freely and voluntarily given. That the defendant had been advised of his Constitutional rights. That there was no coercion, threats, promises or force used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “amounted to a peremptory instruction on the confession and removed from the jury its function of deciding the credibility of the confession and the weight to be given to the testimony of the witnesses surrounding its execution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.