451 So. 2d 844 - State v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 228 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 247 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Carter v. City of Miami (1989), 604 So. 2d 452 - Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach Erosion (1992)
8 federal appellate · 228 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Furman v. Georgia · Yazoo County Industrial Development Corp. Et Al. v. Suthoff Et Al. · Missouri v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas · 403 So. 2d 943 - Buford v. State · 265 So. 2d 499 - Donaldson v. Sack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 247 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e hold that a capital case is one where death is a possible penalty.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“it is not capital in the sense that a defendant might be put to death. Buford v. State, 403 So.2d 943 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1163 , 102 S.Ct. 1037 , 71 L.Ed.2d 319 (1982). Because the death penalty is no longer possible for crimes charged under section 794.011(2), a twelve person jury is not required when a defendant is tried under that statute. State v. Hogan, 451 So.2d 844 (Fla. 1984). Inasmuch as the crime is no longer”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Twelve persons shall constitute a jury to try all capital cases, and six persons shall constitute a jury to try all other criminal cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.