Day v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 1989
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rubenstein v. State · Davidson v. State · 53 Tex. Crim. 281 - Pratt v. State · Schneider v. State · 128 Tex. Crim. 647 - Avirett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There has been no showing that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting Campbell to testify. His testimony did not coincide with any material testimony of the other witnesses for the State and did not contradict the testimony of any defense witness that he heard.” Id., at 509-510 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Archer v. State · Hougham v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.