United States v. Augello’s Empirical Analysis
452 F.2d 1135 · 1971
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 1995 · most notably United States v. Watson (1982), United States v. Tomchek (1977)
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 659 · 28 U.S.C. § 2111
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Glasser v. United States · Bruton v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. District Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Congress has [in section 659] undertaken to protect and promote the flow of goods in interstate commerce, and that this undertaking is not to be hampered by technical legal conceptions.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.