Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 452 F.2d 1383 - Bartges v. Woodworth

Bartges v. Woodworth’s Empirical Analysis

452 F.2d 1383 · 1971

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1997

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

40197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 912

Relies on Bartges v. Woodworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(d) Failure to give such notice shall not bar any claim under this chapter (1) if the employer (or his agent in charge of the business in the place where the injury occurred) or the carrier had knowledge of the injury or death and the deputy commissioner determines that the employer or carrier has not been prejudiced by failure to give such notice, or (2) if the deputy commissioner excuses such failure on the ground that for some satisfactory reason such notice could not be given; nor unless objection to such failure is raised before the deputy commissioner at the first hearing of a claim for compensation in respect of such injury or death.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “1 11 In order that such a determination be made, we remand to the District Court with instructions to direct the Deputy Commissioner to determine whether any basis for excusing the failure to give timely notice exists. Thereafter, the District Court may make proper disposition of the Motions for Summary Judgment. 12 So ordered. * Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 294 (d) (1964) 1 Section 12(d) of the Longshoremen's Act, 33 U.S.C.A. Sec. 912 , provides:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.