Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 452 F.2d 295 - Martin v. Henley

Martin v. Henley’s Empirical Analysis

452 F.2d 295 · 1971

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
4
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2016

9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

7019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · 2 Cal. 3d 752 - Martin v. Martin · Moran Towing & Transportation Co. v. Navigazione Libera Triestina, S. A. · International Refugee Organization v. Republic S. S. Corp. · Harrison v. Donnelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nunc pro tunc amendments are permitted primarily so that errors in the record may be corrected. The power to amend nunc pro tunc is a limited one, and may be used only where necessary to correct a clear mistake and prevent injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.