Ojeda v. Hackney’s Empirical Analysis
452 F.2d 947 · 1972
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
December 1990
most recently cited
9 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sprage v. Ticonic Nat Bank · Dodge v. Tulleys · 319 F. Supp. 149 - Ojeda v. Hackney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In sum, the equitable propriety of the allowance of any amount of attorneys’ fees, and the manner in which those fees, if allowed, are to be collected, is committed entirely to that court’s sound discretion . . . (At 948)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.