United States v. Manzo-Jurado’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
June 2006
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · United States v. Arvizu · Nix v. Williams · United States v. Mallides
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“numerous” work crews which contained illegal immigrants. However, such testimony would apply equally to situations where Havre Border Patrol had encountered five out of six work crews which contained illegal immigrants or five out of one-thousand. In fact, when asked about how likely it was that a given work crew in Havre contained an illegal immigrant, Bischoff candidly responded that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Border Patrol has] encountered numerous work crews in Havre that employ illegal aliens. In some cases, all illegal aliens. In other cases, one or two illegal aliens in the group of workers.” Also at the suppression hearing, Bischoff testified,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“At oral argument, the Government conceded that Manzo-Jurado was seized within the meaning of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and its progeny, so as to require reasonable suspicion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.