United States v. Dunlap’s Empirical Analysis
452 F.3d 747 · 2006
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2020
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Blakely v. Washington · Sutton v. United States · United States v. Lincoln · 118 S. Ct. 143 - Richardson v. Old Republic Surety Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[WJhere a court of appeals vacates a sentence or reverses a finding related to sentencing and remands the case for resentencing without placing any limitations on the district court, the court 'can hear any relevant evidence ... that it could have heard at the first hearing.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because nothing in our original remand order precluded the government from presenting its evidence at resentencing, we cannot say that the district court erred in allowing it to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.