Johnson v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
452 F.3d 967 · 2006
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Santiago v. Blair (2013), Corwin v. City of Independence (2016)
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dulany v. Carnahan · Goff v. Burton · Coleman v. Rahija · Sanders v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Camberos v. Branstad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To sustain his claim based on denial of access to . . . the court, [he] must prove that he suffered an actual injury or prejudice as a result of the alleged denial of access.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.